AQA GCSE English Literature (8702) · Paper 2

🔔 An Inspector Calls

Revision notes written to the specification, with examiner tips and the required practicals. Every point here has flashcards in the Stickwise app.

Plot & structure

The play opens in 1912, as the Birling family celebrate Sheila's engagement to Gerald Croft at their home in Brumley. Arthur Birling gives a confident after-dinner speech praising self-reliance and progress, and this celebration is interrupted by the arrival of Inspector Goole, who has come to investigate a young woman's suicide.

The Inspector questions each member of the family in turn, showing them a photograph of the dead girl and revealing facts only when he needs to. This method stops the family from agreeing on a shared story and builds suspense, as it gradually emerges that everyone in the room played a part in her death: Birling had sacked her for organising a pay strike, Sheila had her sacked from a shop called Milwards out of jealousy, Gerald and then Eric each became involved with her in turn, and Mrs Birling refused her a final request for charity shortly before she died.

Near the end of the play, Gerald discovers that no Inspector Goole exists on the local police force, and a telephone call to the infirmary confirms that no suicide has been reported there. Mr and Mrs Birling conclude that the whole evening was a hoax and that they are no longer in any danger.

Structure

Just as the family begin to relax, the telephone rings again: a real police inspector is on his way to ask them about a girl who has just died after swallowing disinfectant. This cyclical structure, in which the ending returns to the situation of the opening, suggests that the lesson has not really been learned, and that the same events are about to happen all over again.

Characters

Priestley uses each character's reaction to the Inspector to explore where responsibility really lies.

Inspector GooleHis surname sounds like the word ghoul, hinting from his first entrance that he may not be a conventional police officer. He controls the pace of the interrogation, remains unintimidated by Birling's wealth and status, and voices Priestley's own message about social responsibility.
Arthur BirlingA wealthy factory owner obsessed with status and the possibility of a knighthood, he insists that a man should look after only himself and his own family. Dramatic irony, created through his confident but wrong predictions, makes the audience distrust his judgement from the very start.
Mrs BirlingColder and more socially superior than her husband, she denies any responsibility and lies to the Inspector. She had refused Eva's request for charity out of prejudice, telling her to seek help from the father of her child, unknowingly condemning her own son Eric.
Sheila BirlingInitially naive, she had Eva sacked from Milwards out of jealousy. Once questioned, she feels genuine guilt, accepts responsibility, and becomes the Inspector's ally, representing hope that the younger generation can change.
Eric BirlingHe got Eva pregnant after forcing his way into her life while drunk, then stole money from his father's firm to support her. Like Sheila, he feels real guilt and accepts that what he did was wrong, whoever the Inspector really was.
Gerald CroftEngaged to Sheila, he had made Eva his mistress the previous summer under the false name Daisy Renton, before ending the relationship. Once he learns that Inspector Goole is not a real officer, he wants to forget the whole evening rather than change, unlike Sheila.
Eva SmithShe never appears or speaks on stage, and used the false name Daisy Renton with Gerald and Eric. This absence lets her stand for every exploited working-class woman, not just one individual victim, reinforcing the Inspector's closing point about the millions of people like her.
🎯 Examiner tip: Questions on character score well when they explain what a character represents, such as Sheila representing the possibility of change, rather than only summarising what that character did during the evening.

Themes

Social responsibility

Priestley uses the Inspector to argue that everyone is responsible for each other, not just for themselves, which is the opposite of Mr Birling's belief that a man should mind only his own business. Ignoring this lesson, the Inspector warns, will bring people to learn it instead in "fire and blood and anguish".

Class and exploitation

The play shows the wealthy exploiting the working class for profit, through low wages at Birling's factory, easy dismissal from a shop like Milwards, and a charity that judges who deserves help. Priestley contrasts the Birling family's comfortable position, built on old and new money, with Eva Smith's complete lack of power.

Gender

Eva Smith has almost no power as a working-class woman with no money or family name to protect her. Gerald and Eric face very little judgement for their part in her story, while she alone is blamed and denied help, revealing an unfair double standard applied to women.

Generations and guilt

Sheila and Eric accept their guilt and want to change, while Mr and Mrs Birling refuse to learn anything and want everything to stay exactly as it was. Priestley uses this contrast between the younger and older generations to suggest that hope for a fairer future depends on the young.

This difference matters most once the family learns the truth about Inspector Goole. Sheila and Eric still accept responsibility regardless of who he really was, but Mr and Mrs Birling, and at first Gerald too, treat the possibility of a hoax as an excuse to escape their guilt completely.

Context & Priestley's methods

Context: 1912 and 1945

Priestley wrote the play just after the Second World War but set it in 1912, more than thirty years earlier. This gap lets Mr Birling make several confident predictions that the audience already knows are wrong, a technique called dramatic irony, which undermines his authority and judgement from the very start of the play.

His most famous mistakes are to call the Titanic "unsinkable" and to insist that there will be no war. Both claims are proved disastrously wrong within only a few years, so the audience of 1945 immediately distrusts his other opinions too, including his views on social responsibility.

Context: Priestley's politics

Priestley was a committed socialist who wanted a fairer, more collectively responsible society. The play was first staged in 1945, just as Clement Attlee's Labour government began building the welfare state, so its message chimed closely with the political mood of the time.

Priestley's methods: dramatic form

The play borrows the tightly-plotted structure of a recognisable genre known as the well-made play, yet Inspector Goole also works as a morality-play figure: a mouthpiece who judges each character in turn and delivers Priestley's own socialist message directly to the audience.

Priestley's methods: lighting and cliffhangers

The lighting on stage begins warm and soft during the family's celebration, then turns harsh and more revealing once the Inspector arrives, symbolising comfortable self-deception giving way to uncomfortable truth. Each act also ends on a cliffhanger revelation, which keeps the tension high and reinforces the play's cyclical structure.

🎯 Examiner tip: Context earns the most marks when it is tied to a specific technique or moment, for example linking the gap between 1912 and 1945 directly to one of Birling's wrong predictions, rather than described as a separate, disconnected paragraph of historical background.
Turn these notes into memory. 24 flashcards cover this topic. Short daily sessions, spaced repetition up to your exam date, quizzes with friends. Free during the beta.Practise An Inspector Calls in the app ↗